Appellant Oris Reynolds, in his motion for rehearing, argues in four points for reversal and acquittal. Appellant argues that this Court erred in (1) finding sufficient evidence to support the jurys finding that the offense of driving while intoxicated occurred as alleged; (2) holding that the sidebar remark of the States attorney did not constitute reversible error; (3) holding that there was sufficient evidence to establish that appellant was the same person previously convicted; and (4) holding that there was sufficient corroborating evidence to justify the admission of appellants statement against penal interest.
